The in-situ remedial technology of Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) utilizes natural attenuation processes and requires long-term performance monitoring. It an agency approved remediation technology but is considered to be a passive technology.
The advantages of Monitored Natural Attenuation are the following:
- Overall costs may be lower.
- Minimal disturbance to the site operations.
- Potential use below buildings and other areas that cannot be excavated.
- Does not generate remediation wastes.
- Reduced potential for cross-media transfer of contaminants commonly associated with ex-situ treatment.
- Reduced risk of human exposure to contaminants near the source area.
- Natural biodegradation may result in the complete destruction of contaminants in-situ.
- May be used in conjunction with, or as follow-up to, active remedial measures.
The disadvantages of Monitored Natural Attenuation are the following:
- Much less effective where TPH concentrations in soil are high (> 20,000 to 25,000 mg/kg). Not suitable in the presence of free product.
- Not suitable when contamination has impacted a receptor (e.g., impacted ground water supply well, VI in building).
- Longer periods of time to mitigate contamination (especially for heavier petroleum products).
- Site characterization will be more detailed, and may include additional parameters. Site characterization will be more costly.
- Institutional controls may be necessary to ensure long term protectiveness.
- Performance monitoring will require more monitoring locations and a longer period of time.
- May be accompanied by changes in groundwater geochemistry that can mobilize other contaminants.
To learn more about Monitored Natural Attenuation, call one of the environmental site remediation consultants at August Mack Environmental at 800.579.0770.
Comments for In-Situ: Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA)